Skip to main content

RIMM collaps should suprise no one.

The momentum darling, RIMM, gave up over $20 after releasing the Q2 financial results (missed by a penny vs expectation, $0.88 vs 0.89), and lower Q3 bottom line and margin on Thursday after market closed. The management downplayed AAPL eroding its profitability and attributed the disappointment to shrinking margins due to increase SGAN and R&D to expand its market share.

It is quite interesting even RIMM has shined for so long in the last two years and certainly a bright star among analysts and investors, underneath this seemingly unstoppable bull run, there have been gradual but significant build-up of doubts and worries when we examined the derivative markets. After RIMM skyrocketed about five-folds from fall 2006 t0 Oct 2007, and peaked about 133 in Nov 2007, the bearish sentiment began to emerge. We can assess the sentiment by studying the relative positions of the underlying call and put option open interests during the period. The open interests of call option began to slide while the total contract numbers of put option open interest increased after RIMM broke $100, as measured by the ratio total call option open interest to total put option open interest (see the first chart below). The chart indicates that call/put open interest ratio made a significant drop from about 1.2 to barely over 1.00 when RIMM first broke 100 in Q4 2007, and the ratio stayed at the depressed level since then. Even during the latest two RIMM pull backs in July and this week, few investors stepped in measured by the call/put ratio as typically one would expect investors would see it as an opportunity to build positions. It is true the ratio improved somewhat (from about 0.9 to above 1.0). However, the sentiment, at the best, would be regarded as neutral rather than bullish comparing to its historical level. For comparison purpose, when we examined AAPL, a total different picture emerged. As we can see from the second chart, call/put open interest ratio is almost exactly opposite RIMM in the last two years. The bullish momentum has continued to build as AAPL moved up in general trend. Whenever there was pull back in AAPL prices, there were spikes in call/put open interest ratio, such as in summer 07, early 08 and last week. The ratio registered over 1.40 on the 19th, the highest, for every put contracts, there were 1.4 call unmatched contracts. The derivative market seems indicating much strong bullish signal for AAPL.

Even AAPL and RIMM are two favorite momentum players in the last two years among investors, it seems that market conveys much more convictions and belief for AAPL than RIMM, and it seems that RIMM has lost quite bit of its mojo.



Disclosures: Own LEAP AAPL calls




Popular posts from this blog

What history tell us about “Sell in May and Go Away”?

US stock market has experienced one of the best first four-month performance over the last four decades, produced 17.5% price return comparing to 19.1% in 1987. It is the third best price return for S&P 500 index since 1950; the top four-month performance belongs to 27.3% in 1975 as the stock market recovered from a severe bear market in 1973-1974 when the index nosedived more than 42% in two years. With calendar flipped into May and onto summer season of sun, beaches, most likely we would hear a lot of about old Wall Street saying “Say in May and go away” in the media. Moreover, primarily because of the unprecedented nature of speed and magnitude of the current market rally against the backdrop of weakening macroeconomic and corporate earnings backdrops during the period.  Sell in May and Go Way has delivered 6 times more return Historically, the six months between Nov-April frequently experienced extraordinary stock market performance than the six months between May to Oct...

Michael Masters - The Commodity Speculator Crusher?

Michael Masters , the hedge fund (Masters Capital Management LLC .) manager, made some headlines in the Hill and markets for his champions that speculators cause skyrocket high prices for commodities from agricultural grains to metal zinc. Media has raised the questions regarding Mr. Masters's motive because of his investments concentration in transportation. I pull out the his q2 13F regulatory filings via Bloomberg (see the chart below from Bloomberg ), it is interesting to note that he increased weights on industries and utilities, two sectors by 6.1% and 5.8% respectively over 1st q this year. Not surprisingly, two of his top 5 holdings, Delta and US Ariways , make up 33% portfolio. During the quarter, US Airways positions were increased from 2 millions to 4 millions shares, and Delta was almost double the positions too (from 1.05 to 2 millions shares.) I guess the pain must be unbearable when the benchmark crude rocked to over $140 from less than $100 during the quarter. Cer...

Dollar and crude oil price

The skidding of dollars against the major foreign currencies, especially Euro were constantly blamed for the seemingly unstoppable skyrocketing crude oil price. The logical explanation for this relationship often quoted was that crude is traded in dollar and the weakening the dollar is the major reason the higher crude oil and hence gasoline price paid at pump. If the arguments for this negative relationship contributing to a high crude price. We would expect a significant correlations between crude price and dollar strength. Are there any significant correlations between oil and dollar? Regressing crude price with dollar index ( DXY ), we did found the strong negative correlations between the two beginning early 2006 up to now. The correlations reached to the highest at -0.96 today. However, this relationship were neither stable nor constant over time. We can see from the attached chart (the green area represents positive correlations and red areas indicated negative relationships...