Skip to main content

Is US Treasury Yield Curve Flattening or Steepening?



There have been nine 25 bps rate hikes since the Fed tried to normalize short term interest rates, or Fed Funds rates, from Dec 17, 2015, the first hike to the latest of round on December 22, 2018. The short term borrowing rate rose from almost zero percent to the target of 2.25-2.5% as of now, and short term bond yields also climbed along with overnight rates. The benchmark yield of 2 year Treasury bond was near 1% when Fed made the first 0.25% rate increase on December 17, 2015, and it rose nearly 140% to about 2.39% as this note generated. However, the long bond or the yield on 30yr US Treasuries is traded at roughly 2.95%, almost the exactly where it was 3 ¼ years ago. The table below looks at the bond yield changes from the date that the Fed made the 1st hike to today.
Also visually, the central bank’s gradual rate hike policy since 2015 has pushed yields on short (2 year) and intermediate term note (5 year) steadily marched higher and while 30 year bond yield fluctuated at a very narrow range (see chart below; 2yr=green, 5yr=red, 10y=black and 30yr=purple yield history since the first hike.)

As in previous two monetary tightening cycles, most of the rate movements or yield changes concentrated at the short end of the interest rate curve. The back end of curve, the yield on the 30yr bond barely moved at all because Fed Reserve has much direct impact on the short term interests, much less than long bond yield as it is much a function of inflation expectation and economic growth.

All major yield spreads along the Treasury bond securities have come down consistently throughout the tightening cycle, reached “inverted” for the front end of yield curve when Fed rose the Fed funds rate in last December. The yields on 5 year and 7 year bonds were lower than 2 year and 3 year bonds and Treasury bill yields, and the negative spreads between intermediate or 5 year and the short or 2 year notes have been persistent since inverted last December (green line chart below.)

When the Fed made the interest rate policy U-Turn from two rate hikes in 2019 a about three month earlier to no more tightening and “wait and see” for foreseeable future, and also ending the balance sheet runoff soon to maintain a much higher reserve balance. Treasury market rallied and the yield on the most important benchmark note 10 year note crashed down to below 2.4%, or much less than Fed funds target rate 2.5% and all Treasury bill yields, which for the first time since the hiking cycle, the inverted yield curve extended to 10 year notes. This has caused a lot of market headlines news from main street media to social network postings.


But in reality, U.S. Treasury BOND market yield curve has not “inverted” measured between the short end, or 2-year yield and the long end, 10-year or 30-year yields, the traditional bond market yield curve metrics. As the chart above shows that 2-10 year spread has been remarkably stable or totally “flat” since December, fluctuated at 10-20 bps with less than 5 bps on either direction of average 15-16 bps. If we look at the back end of the curve, or 10-30 year bond yield spreads, the curve has been steadily steepened, or bull steepened as resulted of much greater drops in 10 year note yield, the spread has doubled from about 20 bps in December to 40 bps now (see chart below dark blue line.) The whole curve, the difference between 2-30 year yield differentials also is on the rising (orange line chart below.)


So is the yield curve flattening or steepening? The answer is depending on which part of the curve one is looking at. There is no questioning that the yield curve has flattened and even inverted on the majority of tenors, but the diverging movement between 2-10 and 10-30 spreads didn’t happen very often. Last time we witnessed 2-10 spread narrowing while 10-30 widening materially was at the beginning of 2016 when the recession hit some major emerging markets which caused US manufacturing activities declined materially and Fed signaled “data depended” and didn’t raise the rate until the end of the year.

The possible explanation for seemingly contradictory movements, using 10yr note yield as a pivotal point, the yield differentials from 10yr and shorter maturities are narrowing while the spread to 30yr bond, however, is widening, are pretty evident, i.e., probably have much to do with the Fed.

  • The bull flattening of the front part of curve probably is reacting to possible over-tightening policy and possibilities of policy errors, the likely interest rate policy change is rate cut.
  • Because of the possible rate cut and potential monetary stimulus and liquidity injections mentioned above, there would be increasing upper pressures on the financial condition and economic activities, and eventually, price inflation expectation in long run, which would lead to rising spread for the back end of the curve.

The simultaneous bull flattening in the front and bull steepening on the back end is not very common, bull steepening of the back-end curve tended to lead the overall yield curve steepening coming out of “inversion” in previous two Fed policy cycles. We all know what happened in the past, what will happen and when it would happen probably are the most challenging questions. 



Popular posts from this blog

Michael Masters - The Commodity Speculator Crusher?

Michael Masters , the hedge fund (Masters Capital Management LLC .) manager, made some headlines in the Hill and markets for his champions that speculators cause skyrocket high prices for commodities from agricultural grains to metal zinc. Media has raised the questions regarding Mr. Masters's motive because of his investments concentration in transportation. I pull out the his q2 13F regulatory filings via Bloomberg (see the chart below from Bloomberg ), it is interesting to note that he increased weights on industries and utilities, two sectors by 6.1% and 5.8% respectively over 1st q this year. Not surprisingly, two of his top 5 holdings, Delta and US Ariways , make up 33% portfolio. During the quarter, US Airways positions were increased from 2 millions to 4 millions shares, and Delta was almost double the positions too (from 1.05 to 2 millions shares.) I guess the pain must be unbearable when the benchmark crude rocked to over $140 from less than $100 during the quarter. Cer

S&P 500 Index vs Long Term US Treasury Bond

Would investors been better off owing long term US Treasury bond than owning common stocks? If we ask a question “Which investment, large-cap US stocks represented by S&P 500 index and long term US Treasury bonds (20-year maturities or longer) provide a better return over last two decades or which investment choice investors taken have better chance to be ahead?”, to a regular investor or even an investment professional, most likely we would get the answer, “Stock market, of course.” It is reasonable and expected as the U.S. stock market has gone through the longest bull market run in history, and the domestic stock market just registered the 10th anniversary from the bottom of 666 S&P 500 index point on March 9, 2009. Since then, the S&P 500 index has quadrupled as of the Q1 (=2834/666), we have witnessed the rising of new internet giants, like FB and NFLX. The stock market has made many investors happy if they started to accumulate the positions and stayed the cours

What history tell us about “Sell in May and Go Away”?

US stock market has experienced one of the best first four-month performance over the last four decades, produced 17.5% price return comparing to 19.1% in 1987. It is the third best price return for S&P 500 index since 1950; the top four-month performance belongs to 27.3% in 1975 as the stock market recovered from a severe bear market in 1973-1974 when the index nosedived more than 42% in two years. With calendar flipped into May and onto summer season of sun, beaches, most likely we would hear a lot of about old Wall Street saying “Say in May and go away” in the media. Moreover, primarily because of the unprecedented nature of speed and magnitude of the current market rally against the backdrop of weakening macroeconomic and corporate earnings backdrops during the period.  Sell in May and Go Way has delivered 6 times more return Historically, the six months between Nov-April frequently experienced extraordinary stock market performance than the six months between May to Oct as