Skip to main content

The missing link

Since reaching all-time high of 13.31, natural gas has joined with crude oil beginning their equally breath-taking downward spiral as when they marched up at beginning the year. In my early post (7/4), I made a case that natural gas might have much room left to continue its upward momentum comparing to crude oil. The arguments were partly based on the futures market data on Henry Hub (HH) natural gas futures swap that the speculators have incremental increased their bullish bets (net long positions) since starting of 08. There have been no signs that the smart money reduce their bets on long side based on this Friday's CFTC release, granted the net long positions declined somewhat but still on significant on the bullish camp. This really puzzled me considering the size and momentum of long positions on the HH natural gas swap futures market. If the momentum for natural gas has shifted, we certainly would expect the speculators, if not lead the pack, at least join the crowd. This seems don't make a whole lot sense at all.

When I studied the plain vanilla crude oil futures and options data from CFTC, I was even more puzzled with what I found. The results were almost perfect opposite to the HH swap futures data (see the chart below, the red line is HH natural gas spot price and the shaded area represents the net futures and option positions).


As the chart indicates that speculators in the futures and options market have increased their net short positions since the beginning of last year, a startling contrast to HH natural gas swap futures market. The wager on the natural gas decline has accelerated entering 2008 and current net short positions almost were almost triples from the beginning of 2008.

This really presents a interesting and confusing situation. On the surface, it seems that the speculators of HH natural gas swap futures market express total opposite view (very bullish) to the strong bearish positions of the speculators at plain vanilla natural gas futures and options market. How can this be? Is something missing here? Is possible the so-call non-commercial "speculators" in the HH swap futures market not true speculators but commercial users or the so-called index speculators (they typically only hold the long positions and roll the contracts) ? Hope someone can provide more insights.

Popular posts from this blog

What history tell us about “Sell in May and Go Away”?

US stock market has experienced one of the best first four-month performance over the last four decades, produced 17.5% price return comparing to 19.1% in 1987. It is the third best price return for S&P 500 index since 1950; the top four-month performance belongs to 27.3% in 1975 as the stock market recovered from a severe bear market in 1973-1974 when the index nosedived more than 42% in two years. With calendar flipped into May and onto summer season of sun, beaches, most likely we would hear a lot of about old Wall Street saying “Say in May and go away” in the media. Moreover, primarily because of the unprecedented nature of speed and magnitude of the current market rally against the backdrop of weakening macroeconomic and corporate earnings backdrops during the period.  Sell in May and Go Way has delivered 6 times more return Historically, the six months between Nov-April frequently experienced extraordinary stock market performance than the six months between May to Oct...

Michael Masters - The Commodity Speculator Crusher?

Michael Masters , the hedge fund (Masters Capital Management LLC .) manager, made some headlines in the Hill and markets for his champions that speculators cause skyrocket high prices for commodities from agricultural grains to metal zinc. Media has raised the questions regarding Mr. Masters's motive because of his investments concentration in transportation. I pull out the his q2 13F regulatory filings via Bloomberg (see the chart below from Bloomberg ), it is interesting to note that he increased weights on industries and utilities, two sectors by 6.1% and 5.8% respectively over 1st q this year. Not surprisingly, two of his top 5 holdings, Delta and US Ariways , make up 33% portfolio. During the quarter, US Airways positions were increased from 2 millions to 4 millions shares, and Delta was almost double the positions too (from 1.05 to 2 millions shares.) I guess the pain must be unbearable when the benchmark crude rocked to over $140 from less than $100 during the quarter. Cer...

Dollar and crude oil price

The skidding of dollars against the major foreign currencies, especially Euro were constantly blamed for the seemingly unstoppable skyrocketing crude oil price. The logical explanation for this relationship often quoted was that crude is traded in dollar and the weakening the dollar is the major reason the higher crude oil and hence gasoline price paid at pump. If the arguments for this negative relationship contributing to a high crude price. We would expect a significant correlations between crude price and dollar strength. Are there any significant correlations between oil and dollar? Regressing crude price with dollar index ( DXY ), we did found the strong negative correlations between the two beginning early 2006 up to now. The correlations reached to the highest at -0.96 today. However, this relationship were neither stable nor constant over time. We can see from the attached chart (the green area represents positive correlations and red areas indicated negative relationships...