Skip to main content

Applaud AAPL Management

AAPL delivered another great quarter after market closing yesterday (7/21) , beating both EPS and revenue street estimates ($1.19 and $7.46 billion vs. $1.08 and $7.37 billion.) The stock took a beating after AAPL failed the Wall Street's expectations in gross margin and EPS for the coming Q4 and concerning of Steve Jobs's health. It is well known and perceived for many on the street that AAPL has traditionally provided very conservative guidance for coming quarters so that the management have some insurances to delivery positive surprise when it is time reporting earning. I believe there is significant truth about the practice and it is common for some market participants to use the tactics to spin the lack luster business operation into positive light.

For long term (>1 year) investors, however, what AAPL did may prove to be a responsible management strategy. Considering the fact that AAPL has continuously developed some amazing new products distinguished them with "cool" factor with unparalleled fan loyalties, and constant superior financial performance for stake holders, the expectations for AAPL certainly have grown exponentially since the 1st IPod was introduced 7 years ago. Without AAPL management's lowball guidance in the last few years, AAPL might have been traded at much higher level and certainly at a much great risk level. If excess expectation is not tempered, it can feed on itself and on new product frenzy, investors can become irrational euphoria. Any minor miss or miscue in the operations and financial performance due to management or business/economic variables could have devastating impacts on equity performance and business operation. To maintain long term brand and business vitality, it would be important for the management to "immunize" the expectations to prevent euphoria and put too much risk into the stock.

Besides the headlines news that 1mm units 3G iPhone was sold over the 3 day weekend and had sold out in most Apple Stores since the release in the US, we may get some insights on IPhone phenomenon by examining the traffic on Google search using Google Trends. It is a surprise to find that even though IPhone is just entering overseas market, the #1 ranking for searching language is Russian and #1 region is Hong Kong for "IPhone" search traffic. If we use "3G IPhone" as search phrase in Google Trend to examine the traffic for last 12 months (see chart), the #1 searching language, ready for this, Vietnamese, the #1 region is Hong Kong and #2 is Vietnam. The US comes only at #4 after Russian! For comparison, "BlackBerry" or "BlackBerry Bold" search will give you no surprise results, that is English as #1 in language and Canada as #1 in the regions, US comes in the 2nd.


For what happened in last night and today, I can only assume what management did is to manage the expectations for the long term business health. If that is the case, I think it is a savior and responsible business strategy to anchor the market expectation. Is any truth that the guidance is in fact directly related to economic weakness and "product transition"? It probably have something to with it, but I would not surprise that for the sake of long-term benefits and health, the management would not want to see "frenzy" go too far. For investors, this provide a great opportunity to establish positions.


Disclosures: long AAPL calls

Popular posts from this blog

Updated: Will AAPL be $125-150 by July?

In late March, we saw significant bullish bets on AAPL in option markets. In my post " Will AAPL be $125-150 by July ?", we noticed a huge call spread position (10,000 contract) hit the tape on March 25. AAPL was closed at 106 and change, and has rallied more than 35%, which certainly make the owner of this long bull spread position smile proudly. So how much profit we are looking at right now if the investor exits the position today? At this moment, AAPL July 125 call is traded at about $19.50 and July 150 call around $4.20. Ignoring the transaction cost, each contract is worth about $1,530, so the total position is $15,300,000. Remembering that the initial investment was only about $3,950,000, and so net profit would be $11,350,000. The trade almost triples the initial investment just over two months! Not a small feast considering the limited risk profile.

Speculators Held Highest Net Long S&P Futures

Today's dramatic 1000 point reversal of Dow 30 may be just the capitulation point that market has been looking for in this free fall market. Many other sentiment indicators, such as AAII bull and bear readings, VIX and 52 week high/low also point to the extremes. Underneath this gloomy and Armageddon scenario, one of most significant and interesting piece of data is in the futures market, specifically speculator's reading in this scary market. According to today's data release from CFTC, it looks that speculators have positioned for market (S&P500) turnaround. As this past Tuesday, speculators have built more than 102,000 long S&P500 positions, a highest in last five years. More importantly, the speculators also have reduced the bearish bet, short positions to just about 43,000, a lowest level in two years. Without questions, in the last few weeks, the equity market was the darkest period for the long side, but the end may be in sight at least in the short term. Th...

Negative Swap Spread

One of most intriguing event, which barely got any attention in the market, was that, for the first time in the history, 30 year USD swap spread dropped into negative territory today. The US treasury 30 year bond traded at 4.027% and the same maturity US dollar swap traded at 4.051%, i.e, 30 year swap spread was about -2.4 bps (see attached Bloomberg chart below) . The 30 year swap rate only go back to early 1994 in Bloomberg data base, in the last 14 years, swap curve was always and should traded at discount to the treasury benchmark, "risk-free" bogey. So what is mean for the equity and credit market? Or most importantly, is the swap market trying or pricing the much deep recession or an early signal of Japanese-style deflation market has feared in 2003? Is the US treasury credit quality put into challenges? Or just the abnormally due to temporary market forces? Isn't the market facing the greatest CREDIT crisis we ever face since the Great Depression? Should we expect...