Skip to main content

What really Happened?

The fear of Fredie Mac (FRE) and Fannie Mae (FNM) might go under and seems never ending worries of financial system health created chaotic trading on Friday (7/11). On this very "scary" and almost panic market with VIX almost hit 30 intraday, one would fully expect to see the capital flow to the ultra safe US treasuries. However, on the contrary, across the curve, the treasuries tumbled as soon as the equity market opening bell rang, 10yr note fell 1-10/32 and yield shoot up from about 3.80% to close 4.00%, while the Freddie and Fannie bills and notes as well as fixed MBS were attracted quite some interests. For example, the spread of 2-yr agency note to treasury was tightened almost 20 bp from 71.4 bp on Thursday to 52.0 bp on Friday, while on 10 yr part curve, the spread was narrowed from 101.6 to 86.4. Freddie and Fannie CDS were also tightening but not widening. It is amazing to see the risk premium was declining when the risk of underlying companies seems at the highest and almost unthinkable if the market is "efficient."

The popular and convenient explanations for the tumble of treasuries and relative strong performance of agency debts were the possibilities (hope) of the government intervention and rescued both Freddie and Fannie to save the debt investors at the expense of existing equity investors. This sounds logical but can not explained by the fact the treasury sell-off was never stopping from the beginning of early morning, a far earlier than Reuters news story the Fed might open the discount window to both firms. Was the market telling us that the government is for sure going to step in for rescuing or something else? Could this possible that the market sentiment has hit the bottom and some of capitals rotate out of the most over-valued asset class, namely treasuries, back into equity market?
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

What history tell us about “Sell in May and Go Away”?

US stock market has experienced one of the best first four-month performance over the last four decades, produced 17.5% price return comparing to 19.1% in 1987. It is the third best price return for S&P 500 index since 1950; the top four-month performance belongs to 27.3% in 1975 as the stock market recovered from a severe bear market in 1973-1974 when the index nosedived more than 42% in two years. With calendar flipped into May and onto summer season of sun, beaches, most likely we would hear a lot of about old Wall Street saying “Say in May and go away” in the media. Moreover, primarily because of the unprecedented nature of speed and magnitude of the current market rally against the backdrop of weakening macroeconomic and corporate earnings backdrops during the period.  Sell in May and Go Way has delivered 6 times more return Historically, the six months between Nov-April frequently experienced extraordinary stock market performance than the six months between May to Oct...
Read more

MBS spread widen at historical levels

The turmoils at FNM and FRE created great anxieties and opportunities for both equities and debt TRADERS. The newly passed housing rescued packages by the Congress and signed the President essentially changed the "implied" to "explicit" US government backings on both quasi agency's outstanding debts. Their spreads to US treasuries have tightened in last few weeks. However, the most liquid 15 yr and 30 yr fixed MBS from Freddie and Fannie were under great pressures in last few days. Using 10 yr swap rate as benchmark, FNCI (15 yr Fannie MBS TBA) was priced to 5.50% with spread of 78 bps, that was 4 times of historical 10 year average (see the first chart). FNCI was traded at the cheapest level since 1998. The 78 bp spread to the swap was about four sigmas of the mean. FNCL (30 yr Fannie MBS TBA) was also trade at the lowest level that we have not seen in the last decade (second chart). Comparing to other investment alternatives, current fixed MBS prov...
Read more

VXN converging to VIX

Nasdaq markets have been dominated by some of well know large cap tech companies and many smaller less know names too. Not surprisingly, Nasdaq markets measured by NASAQ-100 have been much volatile than SP500. However, since tech bubble busted in 2000, the Nasdaq volatiles measured by VXN declined dramatically and has gradually converged to broad market volatility represented by SP500, VIX (see Bloomberg chart below). Actually, as credit and mortgage market began to melt 18+ months ago, VIX and VXN have been almost in parities. SP500 was much volatile than NASDAQ100 in two of these period, first when Bear Sterns hedge funds fiasco and second time happened in last Nov when financial system was in the breaking point. Financial sector was the one of largest sectors until last year because of market value evaporation from some celebrated financial names, like Bear Sterns, FNMA and Freddie, Lehman and Citi. Almost all these financial firms were traded at the big board and are members of SP5...
Read more